|
|
"A while ago I read of an anthropologist who spent over 20 years studying various Tibetan sects in and around Nepal and India. His study showed how over time, the young male monks changed from a very cooperative, communal, non-competitive society to a more recognizable western, aggressive, competitive,outwardly sexual society as a result of their traditional teaching being replaced with western classroom techniques of teaching."
No, it didn't.
It showed that, over time, the young male monks changed from a very cooperative, communal, non-competitive society to a more recognizable western, aggressive, competitive,outwardly sexual society.
The idea that Western teaching methods were the cause of this is a conclusion, and not necessarily an accurate one. I'd be willing to bet that that 20 year period didn't involve the introduction of Western teaching methods and no other change at all. There was increased presence of Western books, movies, music, and television in Tibet during that period, as well as changing cultural mores in the surrounding regions.
Now, if one group of monks in a region were taught with Western training methods, and one (the control group) with traditional methods, and the ones with Western methods changed to a more aggressive, overtly sexual, 'Western' society, and the control group did not... THAT would suggest that the teaching methods were responsible.
Correlation does not equal causation. |
|
|