|
|
I think the funniest thing about the drinking-nationalist stereotype is that it seems to apply to just about every nation. I've thrown up in many different nations, spurred by the natives and their gluttonous habits. Ever watched a Canadian guzzle beer? Did vodka boat races in St.Petersburg? Seen how much cider is consumed in Helsinki? Drank like the Irish? the English? the Germans (oh! the Germans can drink!), etc etc ad nauseum and the spins. Is there any country where the people do NOT have a reputation for being able to drink? (Don't forget the italians, my god!) And of course, there's the rather dodgy idea that this should create a sense of nationalist pride. Although I will say that I was quite shocked by the early closing times in British pubs - I think it's the reason people there are wasted by 9 as opposed to 12:30.
Mu, drinking alcohol and alcoholism are not really the same thing, are they? The public should be far more aware of the signs of alcoholism (which I take to be alcohol addiction) (in their friends and family, say), because it's not a funny thing. If you're so flippant about the subject, my guess is that you like drinking but are not alcoholic, nor is anyone in your immediate family.
So do they want to cut down on drinking, or on alcoholism? Not everyone who drinks has a problem, obviously. But they have an excellent point when mentioning drinking and driving. Everyone knew the dangers - if the initial aim of the MADD campaign (and similar ones) was to educate the public, they were flogging a dead horse. But they did manage to make drinking and driving something that was socially unacceptable. Someone charged for drunk driving nowadays gets a bit more of the pariah treatment from his/her peers than before. And it's easier now for people to tell each other not to drive if they've had too much. It's become a collective problem, and people look out for one another. That doesn't seem obtuse to me. |
|
|