BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What is the appeal of Animal Man?

 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
13:20 / 15.12.02
I'm considering buying the Animal Man tpb, mainly because it's Grant Morrison writing it (only know him from New X-Men and The Filth, and like what he writes) - so could anyone wiser explain me if Animal Man is worth my money, and why so?
 
 
Jack Fear
14:19 / 15.12.02
Sure. It begins as a smart reinvention of the superhero as socially-committed everyman--really playing up the whole "sense of wonder" aspect of it, as the title character discovers new facets of his own powers--and then moves into far stranger territory: the interface between comics and reality, and what it would be like to discover that the life you were living was someone else's fiction.

Along the way there are some funny, clever riffs on the Silver Age of DC Comics, a slew of cameos by obscure characters, and some well-written family/relationship stuff: the central fact of Animal Man's life is that he's a guy with a wife and kids--as I said, an Everyman--and he's a tremendously appealing viewpoint character, easier to relate to, I think, than scorpion-loa voodoo assassins or mutant Hindu sex gods.

Give it a try.
 
 
some guy
14:27 / 15.12.02
Godawful art, though.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
14:30 / 15.12.02
I agree with Jack. Animal Man, much like Doom Patrol, was far more human and warm than pretty much everything else Grant has written since, but covers many of the same ideas that would later pop up in The Invisibles, and so I think they are vastly superior works.

And the art by Chas Truog is just average, it's definitely not as bad as Lawrence says.
 
 
Seth
14:39 / 15.12.02
Funny, the warmth and humanity in the Invisibles seems pretty self-evident to me. There were quite a few moments - especially in the last volume - that had me wiping a lil' tear from my eye.
 
 
Jack Fear
14:41 / 15.12.02
I actually thought the art was one of the book's strong points. It's good, clean, basic superhero genre stuff, and it kept the story anchored: you could always follow what was going on, even when the action got loopy and metafictional--which isn't the case with some of Grant's other work.

For that very reson, I actually think Grant's storytelling works better, as a rule, when he's paired with a more conventional/cartoony artist.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
16:50 / 15.12.02
Yeah, Chas Truog's stuff is really nice when it's decently inked, which it hasn't always been in the Animal Man issues I have. Take a look at Chiaroscuro to see what I'm talking about.

I'm really, really anxious to read the next TPB already. I (inadvisably) read the last 3 or so issues of Grant's run a while back and I want to see how the series leads up to that conclusion.
 
 
PatrickMM
16:51 / 15.12.02
Having only read the two Animal Man trades that are out, and not the conclusion of Grant's run, I'd have to say that so far it's a better than average superhero story, with a lot of hints about something much bigger. To be honest, if I hadn't heard such good things about the run, I doubt I would have bought the second trade, so don't expect too much, but if the conclusion of the run lives up to what I've heard, the whole run will most likely be worth it.
 
 
mr Squiggle
11:30 / 16.12.02
Chas Truog inked himself on the last issue of the Peter Milligan story that followed Morrisons run. While still not actually being particularly good the art at least had some character to it. The other issues just look like every other average ugly superhero comic of the time. Bolland makes up for it with occasionally stunning & at least very nice covers.
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
12:38 / 16.12.02
I get lot more of a buzz and thrill from reading this old Morrison stuff than anything he's doing at the moment, but it is limited in places by having to wrap everything up in the alloted space, such as the issue with the Time-Master and JLE in Paris.
 
 
gridley
13:52 / 16.12.02
Grant's Animal Man series is fantastic. Probably the first great existential comic book. I don't mind saying that it blew my mind when I first read it.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
14:31 / 16.12.02
and, I reckon, heavilt influenced by Paul Auster's New York Trilogy.

seriously.

The trill was a tumour sized meme lodged in GM's imagination at the time.

See Maximan's speech to the assembled parallel heroes in Zenith phase 3 - speech patterns are exactly the same as that of 'Stillman' from the above name Austerepic.

Animal Man followed shortly after this work and dealt with issues such as authorship, identity etc.
 
 
bigsunnydavros
15:04 / 16.12.02
Animal Man is a great wee read.

Not as fast and flashy as a lot of Morrison's other work, but very good nontheless.

As has been mentioned, Animal Man and Doom Patrol have Morrison's most obviously warm and relatable characterisation and while Animal Man doesn't have the sweaty, lived in buzz of the Invisibles or the rampant insanity of Doom Patrol, it's still equally compelling in its own way.

There's some grest stuff in there about Animal Man and his family, and the whole series builds up to a really amazing climax. The last issue is still one of my favourite comics... probably the most human superhero comic I've ever read.

The artwork is dull though.
It's not horrible and it does do the job, but it's got no spark to it either.
 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
15:40 / 16.12.02
Well, if so much people say good of Animal Man it must be good - and my brief experience with Morrison's work has proven me he's good.

But what exactly is the theme of the series? is it just a guy who has animal powers or something? It has got to be more, i hope.
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
15:50 / 16.12.02
It starts as the story of a man who can access the powers of the animals around him, but then develops into animal rights and wrongs, saving the world 9 to 5 and the nature of reality in the DCU.
 
 
Jack Fear
16:01 / 16.12.02
Do you mean "theme," or "premise"?
How spoiler-iffic do you want us to get, here?

It's very much a comic book about comic books--first in the sense that it rewards a knowledge of obscure DC characters and continuity (Animal Man himself was created in the 1950s and bounced around the DCU for years, though he'd never had his own book) and second in a more literal sense, in that it explores the interface between fiction and reality in fun and interesting ways. To say more than that woiuld be to take us into heavy spoiler territory.

Thematically? Early on, it's the great power/great responsibility thing, as Animal Man consciously moves himself up and into the big leagues, has a political/social awakening and tries to use superheroing to further his ethical causes: in so doing, he's initially a bit naive, but later discovers just how terrible a price he will pay for his principles: and, in the end, discovers exactly who benefits by his pain and suffering.

And again, to go any deeper would put us in spoiler territory.
 
 
Jack Fear
16:01 / 16.12.02
But yeah, on one level it's about a guy who's got animal powers.
 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
16:19 / 16.12.02
Animal rights? Great power/responsability and a guy that can have animal powers? Sounds good - and he saves reality? Busy guy, isn't he? I think it's worth my money, i'll give it a go after all.
 
 
Brigade du jour
22:14 / 16.12.02
Grant Morrison. Oh, and Justice League Europe.
 
 
glassonion
11:54 / 17.12.02
but mainly it's good because it takes a gentle, meditative look at superheroes, this at a time when they all superheroes used girls-on-chains to fight each other. buddy's a really nice guy, too earnest. he's got a lovely family and cute pets, and he does it all for the animals. that's enough surely?
 
 
gridley
13:57 / 18.12.02
Throw in acid trips on mesas and I'm sold, glassonion!
 
  
Add Your Reply